Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Deney Wassermann vs Andrey Chepelev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wassermann vs Chepelev analysis and find out who is favored!
Deney Wassermann vs Andrey Chepelev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wassermann 1 - 0 Chepelev
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wassermann has won 52.58% of points on their second serve, while Chepelev has won 46.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wassermann, in recent form, has won 50.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chepelev has won 55.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.68% and 32.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wassermann has saved 60.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chepelev has saved 57.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wassermann has won 50% of matches played (W/L 19/ 19), with Chepelev winning 64.38% (W/L 47/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wassermann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 71/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3). Chepelev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 383/ 244), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Wassermann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.35% of matches (W/L 19/ 18), where as Chepelev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 44/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wassermann winning 1 times and Chepelev being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wassermann winning 2 and Chepelev winning 0. The last match between Wassermann and Chepelev was at the M15 Antalya, 28-03-2024, Second, Clay with Deney Wassermann getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wassermann and Chepelev have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wassermann winning 0 times and Chepelev 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wassermann winning 0, and Chepelev 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wassermann has played against opponents with an average rank of 190.68 while Chepelev has played against players with an average rank of 137.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wassermann has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chepelev has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wassermann has converted 38.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chepelev has converted 54.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
781
Rank
696
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
542
Rank
339
High
25
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
59% (102-72)
Career Total W/L
60% (391-257)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
40% (4-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wassermann VS Chepelev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Deney Wassermann | Andrey Chepelev |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:0 | 1:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (34/70) | 79% (50/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (24/34) | 62% (31/50) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (19/36) | 23% (3/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (29/63) | 39% (27/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Wassermann VS Chepelev H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Deney Wassermann
Player
Andrey Chepelev
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Deney Wassermann | Andrey Chepelev |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 40% (4/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (20/17) | 41% (9/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (185/163) | 48% (92/99) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 40% (4/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.45 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:10 | 1:38:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.88 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (619/1105) | 68% (426/624) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (442/619) | 59% (253/426) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (254/486) | 44% (87/198) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (45/123) | 59% (32/54) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (452/1133) | 42% (237/563) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (9/8) | 40% (4/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (9/14) | 40% (4/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 17% (6/1) |
Deney Wassermann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Deney Wassermann
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
11
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
13 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
47%
(
7 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
18
Total Points Won
10
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Deney Wassermann
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
15 of
26)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Andrey Chepelev
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Henry Searle
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
75 of
112)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Deney Wassermann
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Andrey Chepelev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Andrey Chepelev
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
79%
(
64 of
81)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Noah Perfetti
78%
(
69 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Andrey Chepelev
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Markus Molder
Player
Andrey Chepelev
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Fix
Player
Andrey Chepelev
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Timofei Derepasko
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Andrey Chepelev
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Samuil Konov
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Calvano
Player
Andrey Chepelev
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve %
61%
(
14 of
23)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
31
Total Points Won
8
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Ghouse Ali Faisal
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Wassermann Vs Chepelev Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
